Saraki VS Sahara Reporters/Sowore: Judge Hands Off, says I Do Not Want To Be A Judge In My Own Case

A high court Judge, Justice Sikiru Oyinloye made a voluntary hands-off over a contempt application filed by Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki, Mr. Omoyele Sowore and his company, Sahara Reporters.
When matters was brought forward at the resumed hearing on Thursday, Oyinloye ordered a halt to further proceedings in a substantive suit where Sowore and his company are seeking to set aside a N4 billion judgment debt earlier issued against them by him ( Oyinloye) for publishing libellous articles against Saraki.


Counsel to Saraki,  Mr. Babatunde had sought to move the application for contempt proceedings against Sowore but Justice Oyinloye asked him not to do so, on the ground that the matter affected the integrity of his court.


“I do not want to be a judge in what seems to be my own case; the application is hereby directed to be taken to the Registry pronto”, the judge said, adding that he had deliberately refused to read the application since it was brought to his office.


In his ruling thereafter, the court directed the counsel to Dr Saraki to return to the High Court Registry and start a fresh process for the assigning of the case by the Chief Judge of the state.

Oyinloye also directed the Registrar of his own court to initiate the transfer of the case file to the main Registry and undertake a daily follow-up of the file until the matter is assigned to a new judge.


The judge later gave the two parties a new date of November 24, 2017 when they are to appear before him to give a progress report on the contempt proceedings.


During the Friday’s appearance, Justice Oyinloye had awarded a fine in the sum of N20, 000 against  Sahara Reporters and Sowore for discontinuing their motion on notice, dated August 18, 2017 stating that the moves taken to withdraw the application would necessarily truncate the business of the court.


Counsel to the defendants/applicants, Mr. Stanley Imhanruor had moved the motion for the discontinuance but while Babatunde Olomu would not object to the motion he, however, asked for N1m cost to being what he said were expenses incurred legal team in the course of preparing for appearance on the matter since the notice was served around 2.30pm, a day before, when all counsels had flown in from Abuja to Ilorin  only at because of the matter.


It was the decision to hands off the contempt aspect of the case that made Olomu to ask orally that further proceedings with two other applications filed by the defendants/applicants be halted in line with established legal position and rules of proceedings.

However, Imhanruor disagreed, arguing that granting an oral application was not allowed in cases like that.


He also argued that since contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature, the presiding court should assume the position of functus officio and not make a pronouncement on the matter.

In his ruling, the third of the day in the matter, Justice Oyinloye dismissed the position of Imhanruor, and cited several authorities to back up Olomu’s argument that once a contempt application has been filed in a proceeding, all other aspects of the proceeding must cease until the determination of the contempt application.


Saraki had initiated the contempt proceeding following the continued publication of what he argued were offensive articles against the court by the defendants/applicants, citing the provisions of Order 47, Kwara State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 which empowers the court to punish for contempt. He said the publications were on despite the earlier judgment of the court.


Speaking with newsmen after the session, Olomu said: “Since delivery of judgement on June 28, they have continued to libel our client contrary to the order of the court to stop making further libellous publication. They had abused the judge, everybody, court, desecrated entire judicial system, not only the judge but pollution of the judiciary. And we said in the law, they must purge themselves of that before we proceed further.


“And that’s the position of the law. And that’s why the judge said that, since he had abused him, he can’t be the judge in his court; let contempt of proceedings be heard by another judge. It is also the principle of law that while the contempt proceedings is going on, all other proceedings must stop.”




For News, Articles, Opinions, write-ups, advertisement, and other related issues or Invitation to cover your events, please contact The Editor, or OR call 07011172166(WhatsApp), 07088886879, 08022433068, 08038472758 (WhatsApp) or NATIONAL NEWSBEAM on Telegram

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Pin It on Pinterest